The largest mammal in North
America is eliminating our forests.
Hello everyone. We thought
for the first informative post on invasive species of Newfoundland we would
start with the Moose (Alces alces). Moose are a main contributor to
Newfoundland tourism and economy. Newfoundland is known for their moose meat
and almost guaranteed sighting of moose on trails throughout Gross Morne Nation
Park. Therefore explaining the impacts that moose have on various other species
here on the island is an important issue to start off with. We will be
discussing how moose ended up here on the Island and what their main impacts
are. We will also discuss the various management strategies proposed and
followed through with for this issue.
These big mammals, though
culturally significant to Newfoundlanders, do not belong here. They were
actually introduced to the island by humans over 100 years ago (Gosse, 2011).
Combined with the fact that wolves – their natural predator – were removed in
the 1930s, they have been able to go largely unchecked in the Newfoundland wilds.
Great, right? We don’t think
so. Although many hunters love this idea, the truth is that these giants are
actually over grazing our forests. They are putting huge pressure on seedlings
and saplings on the island, especially balsam fir. Over time there have been
some major shifts to the forests of Newfoundland due to this, and a major
stress is being put on many other organisms and in some cases even lowering biodiversity
in certain areas. For more information on moose and their effects on our
forests visit http://www.pc.gc.ca/progs/np-pn/sf-fh/info/1.aspx.
A forest stand destroyed by moose in Gros Morne
National Park (©Parks Canada, http://www.pc.gc.ca/progs/np-pn/sf-fh/info/1.aspx)
Moose are an important
economic resource in Canada. Moose hunting generates over $500 million in
economic activity annually and provides large amounts of food for aboriginal
and other rural people. Moose are a major element in the complex of wildlife
attractions that draw visitors to parks and other wildlands to view and study
nature (http://www.hww.ca/en/species/mammals/moose.html).
The impacts Moose have on the
Newfoundland environment are their over grazing of balsam fir seedlings. Long
term browsing eliminates firs and hardwoods which changes the density within
the forest and therefore alters the composition of the forest. Below is a
figure illustrating the pressures on balsam fir due to moose.
Pressure on balsam fir in Newfoundland by moose and other organisms (Goose,
2011).
There is little regeneration
that can occur due to over grazing by moose and the aid of other organisms
limiting growth and spread of seeds.
There are many options that
Parks Canada has considered in managing this event. Therefore reduce the amount
of moose present in an ethical manner.
Some options are:
· • Do nothing,
therefore assume no management and let nature do its part. This is very cheap
however; ecological it can be very costly and can result in total extinction of
balsam firs to Newfoundland.
· • Predator
re-introduction: This method has many risks and unstable results. It changes
the entire food chain and can result in more negative effects than positives,
therefore presents more risk than it is worth. They did re-introduce wolves in
to Yellowstone and more information is presented in this article, http://www.cof.orst.edu/leopold/papers/ripple.pdf.
However, Yellowstone is larger and has a large space can allow for better control
of large predatory mammals.
· • Fertility
control: This is a very costly method but has been used in various places in
the world however only with small populations due to the costs and effort that
needs to be done to make a different in the overall population size, therefore
not being the most efficient method of control here in Newfoundland due to our
large population size.
· • Large scale
fencing: This would be a great conservation method to keep moose out of
sensitive areas. But due to the vast area the fence would need to cover it is
too costly. It is also near impossible to effectively fence coasts.
· • Relocation/translocation:
This again is a non-lethal method however it is very stressful to the animal but
can be indirectly lethal due to that stress. Also moose easily return to areas
they were removed from.
· • Target
Harvesting: This means that a controlled hunt is put in place where so many
licences for moose are given out. This management is used in National Parks
here in Newfoundland. This method is a good method due to its low costs to
manage and it’s non-wastefulness of the species.
Currently, target harvesting
is in place, but is way too low to make a difference.
A main approach to management
is to understand its effects on the public so Parks Canada did a survey to
understand what people think of this method and due to the vast number of
people who apply for harvesting licences (>700 people) it seemed like the
demand was there (Gosse, 2011).
The public are huge
contributors to the management of these animals. Due to the cultural and
economic significance of the moose, many are going to want to keep the moose
numbers healthy. Now we must figure out the delicate balance that keeps
pressure off our forests but keeps moose numbers high enough for hunting.
Therefore we would like to
hear what you think of this topic and what strategies would like to see or any
other methods that could be useful in the managing of these invasive species. Keep
in mind the varying success of some of these strategies outside of
Newfoundland, like in Yellowstone National Park.
Works Cited:
Gosse, J. 2011. Degradation
of Boreal Forest by Non-Native Herbivores in Newfoundland’s National Parks:
Recommendations of Ecosystem Restoration. Natural Areas Journal. 31:331–339
Sether, B. 1983. Life History
of the Moose (Alces alces): Fecundity Rates in Relation to Age and Carcass
Weight. Journal of Mammalogy. 64:266-276.
So many road side accidents in Newfoundland & Labrador are due to encounter with a moose. I think along with all the other factors listed above, if we throw in the emotional factor, this could perhaps strengthen the case being presented.
ReplyDeleteIt can be another big contributor for getting the government to fence the TCH and prevent tragic episodes like this from happening again.
Target harvesting is definitely the best way to go at this problem, even if it's not the most media friendly option. Sometimes drastic measures have to be taken in order to replenish resources!
ReplyDeleteGreat that you referenced Gosse et al 2011 (your citation is incomplete), but there are also other non-native animals mentioned in that paper - and they are also part of the reason that fir forests aren't regenerating - it's not JUST the moose! Perhaps you could give us some thoughts on what role they play in this drama!
ReplyDeleteOh and moose browse, not graze - so what's the difference??
ReplyDeleteGood summary of Parks Canada's position, but there are other factors at play here in forest dynamics, would be nice to see discussed. As my grad student concluded "it's complicated"... Not quite as black and white as you present.
ReplyDelete